| |
|
Reference |
|
| The entirety of any organisation or business entity responsible for implementing the standard. |
|
|
|
A business entity which provides the company with goods and/or services integral to, and utilized in/for, the production of the company's goods and/or services. |
|
|
| Subcontractor/sub-supplier |
|
A business entity in the supply chain which, directly or indirectly, provides the suppliers with goods and/or services integral to, and utilized in/for, the production of the suppliers's and/or company's goods and/or services. |
|
|
| Agricultural Worker Categories |
|
There is a lack of clear-cut distinctions between different categories of workers. Consequently, there are numerous types of labour relations and different forms of labour force participation. The different categories of workers also vary within each country and, in certain cases, a single farmer may be grouped in more than one category. Many smallholders supplement their income with wages earned by working in large commercial farms during harvesting periods. |
|
|
| Summary of broad categories of agricultural workers: |
 |
|
| ILO. Safety and health in Agriculture document |
|
|
Any person less than 15 years of age, unless local minimum age law stipulates a higher age for work or mandatory schooling, in which case the higher age would apply. If however, local minimum age law is set at 14 years of age in accordance with developing country exceptions under ILO convention 138, the lower age will apply. |
|
|
The ILO Minimum Age Convention, No. 138 (1973) states that the minimum age of employment should not be less than the age of completion of compulsory schooling and, in any case, shall not be less than 15 years. However a Member country whose economy and educational facilities are insufficiently developed, may under certain conditions initially specify a minimum age of 14 years. |
|
|
|
| Any work by a child younger than the age (s) specified in the above definition of a child, except as provided by ILO recommendation 146 |
|
|
|
| Any worker over the age of a child as defined above and under the age of 18. |
|
|
| Worst forms of child labour |
|
| Whilst child labour takes many different forms, a priority is to eliminate without delay the worst forms of child labour as defined by Article 3 of ILO Convention 182. |
|
|
|
Hazardous child labour is defined by Article 3 (d) of the ILO Convention concerning the Prohibition and Immediate Action for the elimination of the worst forms of child labour, 1999 (182) 3D work which, by its nature or its circumstances in which it is carried out is likely to harm the health, safety or morals of children. |
|
|
|
An Occupational accident is an unexpected and unplanned occurrence, including acts of violence, arising out of or in connection with work which results in one or more workers incurring a personal injury, disease or death. Included in occupational accidents are travel, transport or road traffic accidents in which workers are injured and which arise out of or in the course of work, i.e. while engaged in an economic activity, or at work, or carrying on the business of the employer. Occupational injury: any personal injury, disease or death resulting from an occupational accident; an occupational injury is therefore distinct from an occupational disease, which is a disease contracted as a result of an exposure over a period of time to risk factors arising from work activity. |
|
| ILO Resolution/Convention 155 on statistics of occupational injuries (resulting from occupational accidents), adopted by the Sixteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians, (Oct.1998) |
|
|
| A disease contracted as a result of an exposure to risk factors arising from work activity |
|
|
|
Welfare facilities may include canteen, occupational health service, provision of meals, recreation service, child care facilities, fringe benefit, workers housing, workers transport. |
|
|
|
Decent work sums up the aspirations of people in their working lives. It involves opportunities for work that is productive and delivers a fair income, security in the workplace and social protection for families, better prospects for personal development and social integration, freedom for people to express their concerns, organise and participate in the decisions that affect their lives and equality of opportunity and treatment for all women and men. |
|
|
|
| This will be one year unless otherwise agreed. The period should include a single complete milling season. |
|
|
| Theoretical recovery of sugar |
|
| The theoretical OR (Overall Recovery) normalized for juice purity and cane fibre content is calculated as: |
|
|
|
|
where wF,C is the fibre content of the cane in g/100 g and PJ the purity of the raw juice. In addition, refining all white sugar in a white end refinery is expected to increase the undetermined loss by 0.4 % of the sugar in raw juice. Then the factor 0.98 becomes 0.976. |
|
|
Irrigated - 85; Supplementary 65; Rainfed 45 (total yield per year/total ha cut/weighted average age at harvest) for each category of water regime. Value for reporting period or 5 year rolling average can be used. Seedcane production (yields and area) should be excluded and non cane areas and roads and contours should be excluded from area harvested. |
|
|
| Phosphate equivalent as a measure of eutrophication |
|
Since phosphorus and nitrogen differ in their eutrophication effects, a phosphate equivalent conversion is used based on potency factors of 3.06 for phosphorus and 0.42 for nitrogen. Using 120 kg N /ha/y and 20 kg P /ha/y, the figure would be (120 x 0.42) + (20 x 3.06) = 112 kg phosphate/ha/y. |
|
| IChemE (2002). Sustainable development progress metrics. Inst. Chem. Engrs. London. |
|
|
High Conservation Value (HCV) areas are defined as natural habitats where conservation/ biodiversity values are considered to be of outstanding significance or critical importance based on factors such as the presence of rare or endemic species, sacred sites, or resources harvested by local residents (see www.hcvnetwork.org). For implementation of the BSI standard each country is required to provide a country specific and official interpretation of High Conservation Value which will be used for audits in that country. A cut off date of 1 January 2008 will apply.
The six High Conservation Values (HCVs):
HCV 1 Areas containing globally, regionally or nationally significant concentrations of biodiversity values (e.g. endemism, endangered species, refugia)
HCV 2 Areas containing globally, regionally or nationally significant large landscape level forests, contained within, or containing the management unit, where viable populations of most if not all naturally occurring species exist in natural patterns of distribution and abundance
HCV 3 Areas that are in or contain rare, threatened or endangered ecosystems
HCV 4 Areas that provide basic services of nature in critical situations (e.g. watershed protection, erosion control)
HCV 5 Areas fundamental to meeting basic needs of local communities (e.g. subsistence, health)
HCV 6 Areas critical to local communities’ traditional cultural identity (e.g.areas of cultural, ecological, economic or religious significance identified in cooperation with such local communities). |
|
|
|
| A significant impact would be apparent if the operations of sugarcane farms or mills resulted in changes to the environment that resulted in (1) the quality and / or quantity of habitat supporting an endangered or threatened species being affected to the extent that the numbers and viability of the species (the classification from the IUCN red list) was adversely affected; (2) conversion, diminution or degradation of the integrity of an endangered habitat such that there was a measurable adverse impact on its ecological status in the opinion of a competent ecologist (3) ecosystem service (such as water supply) being sufficiently changed as to cause material adverse impacts to local communities or ecosystems (for example, flows contain additional nutrients that change downstream ecology or affect the availability of drinking water for downstream communities). |
|
|
| Conducting business with integrity |
|
| Businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery. |
|
| Principle 10 UN Gobal Compact |
|
| Forced or compulsory labour |
|
This shall mean all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily |
|
|
Most common forms of forced or compulsory labour: Forced labour can take many forms – some imposed by the State, but the majority in the private economy…..Forced labour can be an outcome of trafficking in persons and irregular migration… Mechanisms of force applied include debt bondage, slavery, misuse of customary practices and deceptive recruitment systems. Some of the most common forms of forced labour include (for a full list see ILO Handbook): |
|
| Combating forced labour: A handbook for employers and business, booklet 2 |
|
· Debt-induced forced labour: Commonly referred to as “bonded labour” in south Asia, where the practice is most common, but also known as “debt bondage”. .. Debt bondage arises when a person mortgages his or her services or those of his family members to someone providing credit in order to repay the loan or advance. |
|
|
· Forced labour as an outcome of human trafficking: Trafficking in persons, or human trafficking, is often linked to forced labour. It is fuelled by organised criminal networks or individuals and can involve deceptive recruitment, racketeering and blackmailing for the purpose of labour exploitation. |
|
|
Forced labour linked to exploitation in labour contract systems: This can be found almost everywhere in the world today. For example, migrant workers can find themselves "bonded" to a labour contractor because excessive fees have been charged and with limited if any possibility to change the employer once they arrive in the destination country. |
|
|
|
| 1. The term discrimination includes—(Art 1 C111) |
|
|
(a) any distinction, exclusion or preference made on the basis of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin, which has the effect of nullifying or impairing equality of opportunity or treatment in employment or occupation; |
|
|
(b) such other distinction, exclusion or preference which has the effect of nullifying or impairing equality of opportunity or treatment in employment or occupation as may be determined by the Member concerned after consultation with representative employers' and workers' organisations, where such exist, and with other appropriate bodies. |
|
|
2. Any distinction, exclusion or preference in respect of a particular job based on the inherent requirements thereof shall not be deemed to be discrimination. |
|
|
3. For the purpose of this Convention the terms employment and occupation include access to vocational training, access to employment and to particular occupations, and terms and conditions of employment. |
|
|
| Symbols and Abbreviations |
|
| BOD biological oxygen demand |
| COD chemical oxygen demand |
| EMP environmental management plan |
| ESIA environmental and social impact assessment |
| g grams |
| GHG greenhouse gas |
| ha hectares |
| HCV high conservation value |
| kg kilograms |
| kJ kilojoules |
| kWh kilowatt hours |
| L litres |
| MJ megajoules |
| RS reducing (invert) sugars |
| t metric tonnes |
| tc tonnes cane |
| TSAI total sugars expressed as invert |
| y year |
|
|
|
|
|
ILO Core Conventions cover the following issues: Abolition of Child labour (C 138 and C 182), Elimination of forced or compulsory Labour (C 29 and 105), Equal remuneration (C100) and elimination of discrimination in occupation and employment (C111), Freedom of Association (C87) and right to collective bargaining (C98), |
|
|
|
|
|
| ILO Convention 29 (1930) Forced Labour |
|
|
No concession to companies shall involve any form of forced or compulsory labour |
|
|
ILO Convention 105 (1957)
Abolition of forced Labour |
|
|
| Not make use of any form of forced or compulsory labour. |
|
|
| ILO Convention 138 (1973) Minimum Age |
|
|
Abolition of child labour and definition of national minimum age for labour not less than 15-18 years (depending on occupation). |
|
|
| ILO Convention 182 (1999) Worst Forms of Child Labour |
|
|
Abolition of child slavery, debt bondage, trafficking and procurement for prostitution; suitable methods to monitor and enforce compliance |
|
|
| UN declaration on Rights of the Indigenous Peoples (2007) |
|
Articles 17 (2), 21, 22 (2) |
|
No exploitation or exposure to hazard or discrimination against indigenous women and children |
|
| Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining |
|
| ILO Convention 87 (1948)Freedom of Association and Protection of Right to Organise |
|
|
Freedom to join organisations, federations and confederations of their own choosing, with freely chosen constitutions and rules; measures to protect the right to organise |
|
|
| ILO Convention 98 (1949) Right to organise and collective bargaining |
|
|
Protection against anti-union acts and measures to dominate unions, established means of voluntary negotiation of terms and conditions of employment through collective agreements. |
|
|
| UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) |
|
|
Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination and to freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. |
|
| Non discrimination and equal remuneration |
|
| ILO Convention 100(1951) Equal Remuneration |
|
|
Equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value |
|
|
| ILO Convention 111 (1958) |
| Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) |
|
Articles 1-2 |
Equality of opportunity and treatment in respect to employment and occupation; no discrimination on the basis of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin. |
|
|
| UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) |
|
Articles 2, 8 (2e), 9, 15 (2), 16 (1), 21 (2), 22, 24 (1), 29 (1), 46 (3) |
No discrimination based on origin or identity; free to express identity based on custom; special attention to full protection of rights of indigenous women. |
|
| Just employment of migrants |
|
| ILO Convention 97 (1949) Migration for Employment |
|
|
Provision of Information; no obstacles to travel; provision of health care; non discrimination in employment; accommodation, social security and remuneration; no forced repatriation of legal workers, repatriation of savings. |
|
| Protection of small holders |
|
| ILO Convention 117 (1962) Social Policy (Basic Aims and Standards) |
|
|
Alienation with due regard to customary rights, assistance to form cooperatives, tenancy arrangements to secure highest possible living standards. |
|
|
| ILO Convention 169 (1989) on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples |
|
|
Respect and safeguard rights to lands and natural resources traditionally occupied and used; respect for customs of inheritance; no forced removals; compensation for loss and injury |
|
|
| UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) |
|
|
| Right to distinctive relationship with land; right to own, use, develop and control their lands, territorities and other resources |
|
|
| UN Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) |
|
|
Protect and encourage customary use of biological resources in accordance with traditional practices |
|
| Fair Representation and Participation of Indigenous and tribal peoples |
|
| ILO Convention 169 (1989) on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples |
|
|
Represent themselves through their own representative institutions; consultations with objective of achieving agreement or consent; rights to decide their own priorities, retain their own customs and resolve offences according t customary law (compatible with international human rights) |
|
|
| UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) |
|
Articles 10, 11 (2), 19, 28 (1), 29 (2) and 32.(2). |
|
Right to free, prior and informed consent to any project affecting their lands as expressed through their own representative institutions. |
|
|
| Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, InterAmerican Human Rights System |
|
UN CERD Committee, UN Committee on Social Cultural and Economic Rights, InterAmerican Commission on Human Rights |
|
Free, prior and Informed consent for decisions that may affect indigenous peoples. |
|
|
| ILO Convention 184 (2001) Safety and Health in Agriculture |
|
|
Carry out risk assessments and adopt preventive and protective measures to ensure health and safety with workplaces, machinery, equipment, chemicals, tools and processes; ensure dissemination of information; appropriate training, supervision and compliance; special protections for youth and women workers; coverage against occupational injuries and disease. |
|
| Control or Eliminate Use of Dangerous Chemicals and Pesticides |
|
| Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (2001) |
|
|
Prohibit and/or eliminate production and use of chemicals listed in Annex A of the Convention (eg Aldrin, Chlordane, PCB); restrict production and use of chemicals in Annex B (eg DDT); reduce or eliminate releases of chemicals listed in Annex C (eg Hexachlorobenzene). |
|
|
| FAO International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and use of Pesticides (1985, Revised 2002) |
|
|
Curtail use of dangerous pesticides where control is difficult; ensure use of protective equipment and techniques; provide guidance for workers on safety measures; provide extension service to small holders and farmers; protect workers and bystanders; make available full information on risks and protections; protect biodiversity and minimize impacts on environment; ensure safe disposal of waste and equipment; make provisions for emergency treatment for poisoning. |
|
|
| Rotterdam Conventions on Prior and Informed Consent Procedure for certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (1998) |
|
|
Curb trade in banned and hazardous chemicals and pesticides; develop national procedures for control of their use and trade; the Convention lists banned and hazardous chemicals and pesticides. |
|
|
| UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) |
|
Articles 21 (1), 23, 24, 29 (3) |
|
Improvement of livelihood in sanitation, health and housing; participate in health delivery; maintain traditional health systems; effective monitoring of health. |
|
|
| Ramsar convention on wetlands of International Importance |
|
|
|
| Cultural and natural heritage protection |
|
| World Heritage Convention concerning the Protection of the World cultural and Natural heritage |
|
|
|
| Conservation of biological diversity |
|
| Convention on Biological Diversity |
|
|
|
BSI Scheme for calculation of greenhouse gas emissions from sugarcane growing and processing |
|
The operational boundary includes growing and processing of sugarcane. It considers the boundary to include each individual mill and its growers as a unit, rather than a company owning and operating more than one mill. In the case of IPPs (Independent Power Producers) providing steam and power to a mill from bagasse that has been provided by the mill, the IPP is considered together with the mill concerned. The system boundary includes in addition the energy embedded in the manyufacture and supply of all fertilizers and chemicals, but excludes the energy embedded in agricultural and milling capital equipment. All the activities of a plant on one site are considered, to reflect the sustainability of the total system producing food, fuel, energy and chemicals.
This analysis represents a B2B analysis, considering the operation of a cane sugar processing facility, producing raw sugar and/or ethanol at the factory gate. Stand-alone refineries are not considered to be within the boundary. It accounts for the provision of products to a third party that is not the end user (cradle-to-gate). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Direct and indirect effects |
The energy and GHG calculations are associated with direct energy inputs and at a second level by indirect inputs. Direct inputs are mainly fuel and power inputs, expressed in terms of their primary energy value. Indirect inputs include, in addition, the energy required for the production of chemicals, fertilizers and other materials used. The indirect inputs do not include the additional energy necessary for the manufacture and construction of farm, transport and industrial equipment and buildings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Land Use Change |
Land use change can be separated into direct and indirect components:
• Direct land change refers to a change from the original state of the land to use for sugarcane production. Depending on the previous use of the land in question, it is surmised that the land use change can unlock some of the carbon in the existing soil and vegetation. |
|
• Indirect land use change concerns secondary effects induced by large scale expansion. This displaces existing crops, leading to expansion of crop land elsewhere, either in the same country or in other parts of the world. The effects of these changes are very difficult to estimate. |
|
If the product’s supply chain directly caused non-agricultural land to be converted to agricultural use on or after 1 January 2008, then GHG emissions associated with the land use change are included in the carbon footprint calculation, consistent with the EU directive. In the absence of better information, the table of default land use change values for selected countries published in the PAS 2050 is used (BSI 2008), which values are also used by the RTFO. |
|
Because the methods and data requirements for calculating emissions from indirect land use change are not fully developed, the assessment of emissions arising from indirect land use change is not included here, or in fact in any current estimation system. This could change in the future if indirect effects can be calculated with more certainty and accuracy. |
|
The EU Renewable Energy Directive allows for a substantial credit of 29 g CO2eq/MJ for a period of 10 years if severely degraded or contaminated land is used for biofuel crop purposes. It is suggested that this be allowed for. |
|
|
4. Handling of co-products and multiple products |
| Two approaches are possible: |
|
• The “substitution” or “displacement” method attempts to model reality by tracking the likely fate of by-products. Each co-product generates an energy and emission credit equal to the energy and emissions saved by not producing the material that the co-product is most likely to displace. |
|
• The “allocation” method allocates energy and emissions from a process to the various products according to mass or energy contents or monetary values. |
|
In the case of sugarcane processing, a factory exporting power or bagasse achieves a credit in terms of energy and emissions saved, according to the displacement of energy in that country. Some standards recommend the use the grid average GHG intensity to calculate the GHG credit for the exported power. However it is more realistic to use the marginal energy mix. Since the marginal energy provision is likely to be from fossil fuels, the saving estimate is conservative when using the average generation mix. In this case, the approach aligned with the EU RED is adopted, which states that for calculating exported power credits, the average factor should be used.
Where a factory produces only sugar and molasses, the allocation in proportion to market value is adopted; in most cases the allocation to molasses is less than 10 % of the total. Although the prices will change over time, the relative values will be far more stable. It is possible to use a displacement calculation, assuming that molasses displaces certain ingredients in an animal feed. However this is likely to vary significantly in different countries.
In the case of a factory producing more or less equivalent quantities of sugar and ethanol, the split of energy input and GHG emissions between the two products becomes a more difficult issue. The EU RED requires that allocation should be by energy content of the products. Sugar has a calorific value of 16500 MJ/t and ethanol 21 MJ/L; on the basis that 600 L of ethanol are produced from one tonne of sucrose, this implies a sugar equivalent value of 27.5 MJ/L for sucrose. On this basis, 57 % of the emissions should be allocated to sugar and 43 % to ethanol. Alternatively the energy use and emissions are also allocated on a mass basis on equivalent sugar, on the basis that 1 tonne sugar is equivalent to 600 L ethanol.
In the case of an autonomous distillery, where the only product is ethanol, energy use and emissions are related to litres of ethanol produced or to MJ in ethanol. |
|
|
5. Components contributing to emissions |
CO2 from sugarcane emitted in combustion and in ethanol fermentation is considered zero CO2 emission to the air, because this is the carbon taken in from the air during sugarcane growth. CO and VOCs emitted in combustion are assumed to be converted to CO2 fairly rapidly, but methane and nitrous oxides from burning bagasse are accounted for in GHG emissions. CO2 emissions arising from biogenic carbon sources are excluded from the calculation of GHG emissions from the life cycle of products, except where the CO2 arises from direct land use change.
The greenhouse gases covered are CO2, N2O and CH4. Methane and N2O have global warming potentials 25 and 298 times that of CO2 respectively (IPCC 2007). Greenhouse gas emissions are aggregated on a carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) basis.
Non-CO2 emissions arising from both fossil and biogenic carbon sources are included in the calculation of GHG emissions. In the case of burning bagasse in sugar mill boilers, it is assumed that 30 g CH4 and 4 g N2O are produced per 1000 MJ of energy in the bagasse burnt, based on IPCC data for burning of biomass. Changes in the carbon content of soils, either emissions or sequestration, other than those arising from direct land use change, are excluded from the assessment of GHG emissions. Any GHG emissions arising from transport required during the product and raw materials life cycle are included in the carbon footprint assessment. Emission factors for transport include emissions associated with creating and transporting the fuels required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Calculation method |
A materiality threshold of 1 % has been suggested to ensure that very minor sources of life cycle GHG emissions do not require the same treatment as more significant sources.
Both the energy usage and emissions are calculated in the same spreadsheet, since the latter are largely determined by the former. The calculation includes the effects of the manufacture of fertilizer. Farming operations include chemicals application, irrigation, tillage and harvesting (and preparation of cane setts for planting). Cane transport covers getting the cane to the mill. The cane is processed to sugar and molasses or ethanol, and may include export of electric power or bagasse. The energy embedded in the manufacture of milling and other equipment is excluded. Inclusion of energy embedded in capital goods and equipment generally has an effect of less than 10 % on calculated emissions and is excluded. No allowance for transport of products from the factory is allowed for.
The primary energy is calculated. It differs from the direct energy input in that it takes into account the efficiency of generation and supply of the secondary energy source e.g. using a conversion factor from energy in the fuel used to generate electricity to the energy in the power produced. This applies to power, fuel, steam and any other energy input.
The GHG balance is particularly uncertain because of fertilizer nitrous oxide emissions and error margins can be enormous. The use of nitrogen fertilizers results in GHG emissions in two stages: fertilizer manufacture (primarily CO2 emissions from energy used) and fertilizer application (primarily N2O emissions from nitrification and denitrification processes in the soil). The assumption is made that 1.325 % of N in nitrogen fertilizer is converted to N in N2O through nitrification and denitrification, following the IPCC recommendations.
In addition, agricultural lime application results in GHG emissions from both production energy use and in-soil reactions that release CO2. These latter emissions are a further source of uncertainty. The model uses the IPCC factor of 0.44 kg CO2eq/kg lime, which assumes that all C in lime becomes CO2. This is the upper limit; it is possible in weakly acidic soils that limestone results in a net sink of CO2.
The calculation approach adopted in this study is similar to that used in the EBAMM model (Farrell et al. 2006), which itself is similar to the GREET model (Wang et al. 2008). These models have been used in the past mainly to model the production of biofuels from corn, and they have had to be modified for sugarcane to incorporate additional issues as follows: |
|
1. |
Modifications to incorporate sugar manufacture as the major activity. This includes power, fuels and lubricants. |
2. |
Emissions due to cane burning. This is based on IPCC emission factors for burning biomass of 0.07 kg N2O/t dry matter and 2.7 kg CH4/t dry matter. |
3. |
Energy value of process chemicals. |
4. |
A credit for molasses (where produced) based on its economic value relative to that of sugar. Volatility in this allocation method is introduced by changes in price and markets, and will have to be monitored. |
5. |
Emissions from anaerobic treatment of effluent in the case that methane is not captured and used as a fuel. IPCC guidelines suggest 0.21 t CH4 produced per t COD removed. |
6. |
Allowance for N2O emissions from filter cake, vinasse and cane residue left in the field. This assumes 1.225 % of N in the residue is converted to N in N2O (Macedo et al. 2008). |
7. |
Allowance for any imports of molasses, bagasse and/or other biomass. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Default and secondary data |
Secondary data (obtained from sources other than direct measurement) are used to calculate emissions where primary data are not available or inappropriate, to enable consistency and, where possible, comparability: |
|
| |
• Global warming potential of greenhouse gases |
| |
• Electricity emissions (in kg CO2eq/kWh) from various energy sources |
| |
• Energy content of fertilizers per kg |
| |
• Energy use of pesticides and herbicides per kg |
| |
• Fuel emissions per litre |
| |
• Waste emissions per kg |
| |
• N2O and CH4 emissions from burning bagasse |
| |
• N2O and CH4 emissions from burning cane |
| |
• Energy embedded and emissions for process chemicals |
| |
• Direct land use change |
| |
• Agriculture emissions from soils |
|
An additional set of default values might also be used for farmers where primary data cannot be used for the following: |
|
| |
• Energy content for delivery of irrigation water |
| |
• Energy use for preparing seed cane |
| |
• Maintenance burning |
| |
Default values used are given in the Annexure. |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Presentation of results |
The agricultural and processing phases are dealt with separately. Thus outputs are available as: |
|
Net energy use in agriculture |
MJ/ha or MJ/t cane |
Energy used in cane transport |
MJ/t cane |
Net energy use in processing |
MJ/t cane of MJ/t sugar |
Total net energy use |
MJ/t sugar or MJ/L ethanol |
Agricultural GHG emissions |
kg CO2eq/t cane |
Processing GHG emissions |
kg CO2eq/t cane or kg CO2eq/t sugar |
Total net GHG emissions |
g CO2eq/g sugar |
| |
g CO2eq/L ethanol and/or g CO2eq/MJ ethanol |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References |
BSI (2008). PAS 2050:2008 – Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services.
Farrell A.E.; Plevin R.J; Turner B.T.; Jones A.D.; O’Hare M.; Kammen D.M. (2006): Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311, 506-508.
Graboski M. S. (2002). Fossil Energy Use in the Manufacture of Corn Ethanol. Prepared for the National Corn Growers Association.
GRI (2008). Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Version 3.0.
IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva.
Macedo I.C.; Seabra J.E.A.; Silva J.E.A.R. (2008). Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: The 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. Biomass and Bioenergy 32, 4.
Shapouri H.; Duffield J.; McAloon A.; Wang M. (2004): The 2001 net energy balance of corn-ethanol. Proc. Conf.on Agriculture as a Producer and Consumer of Energy. Arlington VA.
Wang M.; Wu M.; Huo H.; Liu J. (2008). Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emission implications of Brazilian sugarcane ethanol simulated with the GREET model. Int. Sugar J. 110, 1317, 527-545. |
|
| P. W. Rein GHG Calculation 7 July 2009 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
ANNEXURE DEFAULT VALUES USED |
It is expected that some of these default values will change as more accurate or realistic values are published. Further fine tuning may also be incorporated in future e.g. in allowing for different emissions from different types of nitrogenous fertilizer. It may also be necessary to introduce country specific default values where they are seen to make a material difference to the calculations.
Most of the default values are obtained from the EBAMM model (Farrell et al. 2006), often based on the GREET model using data from Shapouri et al. (2004) and Graboski (2002), or from Macedo et al. (2008).
|
|
Fertilizer and agricultural chemicals, in MJ/kg: |
|
Energy Demand
(MJ/kg) |
Emissions Factor
(kg CO2eq/kg) |
Emissions on
Application
(kg CO2eq/kg) |
Nitrogen (elemental) |
56.9 |
4 |
6.2 |
Potash (K2O) |
7 |
1.6 |
|
Phosphate (P2O5) |
9.3 |
0.71 |
|
Lime (CaCO3) |
0.12 |
0.07 |
0.44 |
Herbicide |
355.6 |
25 |
|
Insecticide |
358 |
29 |
|
|
Primary energy inputs and emissions: |
|
Energy Demand
(MJ/MJ fuel) |
Total emissions
(g CO2eq/MJ) |
Gasoline |
1.14 |
85 |
Diesel |
1.16 |
91 |
Fuel Oil |
1.24 |
96 |
Natural Gas |
1.12 |
66 |
Coal |
1 |
107 |
Electricity |
2.5 |
150* |
|
Energy demand data from Macedo et al. (2008), emissions from EBAMM
*Average value; country specific values should be used.
The energy value is multiplied by the Energy Demand factor to give the primary energy value.
|
Embedded energy and emissions for process chemicals: |
|
Energy Demand (MJ/kg) |
Emissions Factor
(g CO2eq/MJ) |
Lime (CaO) |
0.11 |
951 |
Biocide |
3.02 |
951 |
Nitrogen |
56.33 |
951 |
Caustic |
75 |
951 |
Sulfuric acid |
2.4 |
951 |
Anti-foam |
10 |
951 |
Miscellaneous |
50 |
95 |
|
1. Macedo et al. (2008); 2. Mortimer et al. (2004); 3. EBAMM
|
Main issue |
Y/N* |
Measures/ practices |
Responsibility |
Target |
Progress |
|
Examples of measures/ practices |
Biodiversity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endangered species |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repair habitat |
Endangered habitats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain habitat |
Endangered ecosystems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-plant riparian zones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control invader plants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove cane from riparian areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re habilitate wetlands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-habilitate poor performance fields to natural vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control invader pests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ecosystem services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flood control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wetland maintenance and repair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drain maintenance or closure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-vegetate wetlands and stream banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sediment trap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wetland maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form sediment traps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pollution control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wetland maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wetland re vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise fertilizer and crop chemicals run off by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bury urea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timing of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Correct application rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibrate application equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid application near waterways |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon capture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximise trash retention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replant riparian vegetation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise burning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erosion control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conservation layout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum tillage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drainage channels grassed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drainage channels shaped |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water ways shaped and grassed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximise soil cover |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise soil disturbance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strip harvesting and planting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soil health -Organic carbon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of trash blanket |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burnt tops management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burning - cold burn versus hot burn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fallow cropping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic manures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infield harvesting and loading management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soil disturbance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harvest planning according to soil physical properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soil acidity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acidification management - lime application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acid sulphate soils amelioration programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soil salinity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation water quality improvement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conservation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trash blanket |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burnt tops management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise soil disturbance |
Irrigation management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Choice of system - according to soil type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management of system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation scheduling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salinity management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality - nutrients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise off field movement or percolation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bury volatile N forms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time applications according to weather conditions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality - crop chemicals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ensure chemicals applied at registered rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ensure only registered chemicals used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise residual chemicals and highly toxic chemicals use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality - for irrigation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid use of low quality water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GHG - emissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise use of volatile nutrients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bury volatile fertilizer types - e.g. Urea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apply non volatile nutrients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timing of application to reduce volatilisation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise crop burning and residue burning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise soil disturbance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimize fuel usage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Particulates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise burning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timing of burning in relation to weather conditions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise use of inputs requiring energy for manufacture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimise use of non renewable energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crop Protection Chemicals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimize product residuals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fertilizer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bury urea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pests and Diseases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promote biological control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Issue addressed in EMP Yes/No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|